Legal Opinion

Ringier American v. ST. OF ARIZ. DEPT. OF REVENUE

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 5, 1995No. 1 CA-TX 94-0010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

Appellant Ringier American (“Ringier”) appeals from a written tax court judgment dismissing its special action under Ariz.Rev. StatAnn. (“AR.S.”) § 11-506 for a partial refund of personal property taxes for tax years 1987 to 1990. We hold that Ringier’s claims are not cognizable under A.R.S. § 11-506, and that because Ringier failed to timely pursue the proper statutory procedures for appellate review, no remedy is available. The tax court’s judgment is therefore affirmed.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1990, Appellants Maricopa County, et al. (“DOR”) audited Ringier’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. S & R PROPERTIES v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. Dunlap v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. E.C. Garcia & Co. v. Arizona State Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Westward Look Development Corp. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Widger v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westin Tucson Hotel Co. v. State Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Abrams Airborne Manufacturing, Inc. v. State Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API