Legal Opinion
Pinellas County v. Interpace
Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
Decided June 6, 1990No. Case No. 83-13313-08Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FRED BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND FINAL JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF, PINELLAS COUNTY
THIS CAUSE is before the Court for determination upon Plaintiff, PINELLAS COUNTY’S, First Amended Complaint claiming that a thirteen and one-half mile segment of its major water transmission main made of 54-inch and 60-inch diameter prestressed concrete pipe is defective and should be replaced. The prestressed concrete pipe was manufactured during 1977 and 1978 by a nationally known pipe manufacturer known as Interpace Corporation. On May 3, 1985 Interpace…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Carraway v. RevellSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Fla. Power & Light v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.