Commonwealth v. Chiesa
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence which was imposed upon appellant, Randy Chiesa, after his conviction for robbery and criminal conspiracy. We affirm.
Appellant raises six issues which arise from searches and seizures which were conducted by the police.
Appellant contends that: (1) the first search of appellant's automobile was illegal because it was without a warrant; (2) the first search of appellant’s automobile was illegal because the doctrine of plain view is inapplicable; (3) the warrantless search was illegal because the police officer failed to establish…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MilyakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. LemanskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. CarelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.