Legal Opinion

Reese v. Muret

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 2, 2007No. 92,809, 92,810PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rosen, J:

This is a paternity action in the context of a probate case. Heather S. Reese (formerly Waldschmidt) (Heather) seeks a determination that she is the child of Wade Samuel Waldschmidt, Jr. (Sam). Sam’s spouse, Sandra Waldschmidt (Sandra), opposed Headier s claim as a child in Samuel’s intestate estate and filed a motion for genetic testing. Headier filed a paternity action pursuant to the Kansas Parentage Act, claiming that Sam was her presumptive father. Sandra intervened in the paternity action and moved for genetic testing. The district court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. In Re Estate of AntonopoulosSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. In Re Harris Testamentary TrustSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. In re the Conservatorship of HuertaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. In Re the Estate of FoleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greer ex rel. Farbo v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Secretary of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. KimbrelCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  3. In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. STATE EX REL SECRETARY OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES v. KimbrelCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API