Legal Opinion

Annis v. First Union National Bank of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 6, 1990No. 89-2624Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

In their motion for rehearing, appellees argue that although the proffered deposition testimony of Porter would have been admissible during the appellants’ case-in-chief, it was not admissible for purposes of impeachment during rebuttal, absent the foundation required by Section 90.614(2), Florida Statutes, which provides:(2) Extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement by a witness is inadmissible unless the witness is first afforded an opportunity to explain or deny the prior statement and the opposing party is afforded an opportunity to interrogate him on it,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hoctor by and Through Hoctor v. TuckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Saucier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API