Legal Opinion
State v. Doe
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 1977No. 2876PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
This Children’s Court appeal involves the timeliness of the hearing on the petition. Other issues listed in the docketing statement were not briefed and, therefore, were abandoned. State v. Vogenthaler, 89 N.M. 150, 548 P.2d 112 (Ct.App.1976). The issue of timeliness involves: (1) the statute, (2) Children’s Court rule, and (3) whether the statute or the rule is controlling.
The child was committed to the Boy’s School at Springer in February, 1976. According to the briefs, he was paroled by the school. A petition to revoke this parole was filed November 24, 1976. This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. VogenthalerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Delgado v. StanleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. ArnoldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ConneryNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Barker v. BarkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- American Automobile Ass'n v. State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.