Garrigan v. Superintendent of MaryLand State Reformatory for Males
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Bruñe, C. J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The applicant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus asserts five grounds for its issuance. These are: first, that the police repeatedly stated “that they would ‘have nothing to do’ with your Petitioner, either in proving him innocent or obtaining complete data in events surrounding [his] arrest”; second, that his prosecution as a second offender under the narcotics law placed him in double jeopardy by subjecting him to a second punishment for the same offense; third, that the indictment which set out his prior offense as well as the current…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Beard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- McCoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Beard v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Hamilton v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Garrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Sullivan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Torres v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.