Legal Opinion

Garrigan v. Superintendent of MaryLand State Reformatory for Males

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 5, 2001No. [H.C. No. 5, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bruñe, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The applicant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus asserts five grounds for its issuance. These are: first, that the police repeatedly stated “that they would ‘have nothing to do’ with your Petitioner, either in proving him innocent or obtaining complete data in events surrounding [his] arrest”; second, that his prosecution as a second offender under the narcotics law placed him in double jeopardy by subjecting him to a second punishment for the same offense; third, that the indictment which set out his prior offense as well as the current…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Beard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. McCoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Beard v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Hamilton v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Garrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Torres v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API