Legal Opinion

Gadberry v. McQueen-Kuenzel

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided September 16, 2024No. 4:23-cv-01311Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JUSTIN GADBERRY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:23CV1311 HEA ) JALESIA FRANKLINA McQUEEN KUENZEL ) and ANTHONY ALOYSIUS KUENZEL, III ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No 10]. Plaintiff opposes the Motion and has filed a written opposition thereto. Defendants have filed a Reply, and although leave was not sought nor granted, Plaintiff has filed a Sur reply. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be granted. Facts and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API