Gadberry v. McQueen-Kuenzel
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JUSTIN GADBERRY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:23CV1311 HEA ) JALESIA FRANKLINA McQUEEN KUENZEL ) and ANTHONY ALOYSIUS KUENZEL, III ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No 10]. Plaintiff opposes the Motion and has filed a written opposition thereto. Defendants have filed a Reply, and although leave was not sought nor granted, Plaintiff has filed a Sur reply. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be granted. Facts and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.