Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chandler v. Siegelman

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 13, 2001No. Nos. 97-6898, 97-6953Published

1DissentBarkett, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the court’s denial of rehearing en banc. I believe the reinstatement of the panel decision in this case,1 (“Chandler II ”) after remand by the *1033Supreme Court in light of Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290, 120 S.Ct. 2266, 147 L.Ed.2d 295 (2000) (“Santa Fe ”), is precluded by the Supreme Court’s Establishment Clause precedent, especially Santa Fe, and warrants consideration by the entire court.

This case arose as a result of the fourth attempt by the Alabama legislature to pass a law intended to facilitate “student prayer” in public classrooms…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lee v. WeismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Wallace v. JaffreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Santa Fe Independent School District v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Board of Ed. of Westside Community Schools (Dist. 66) v. MergensSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Chandler v. SieglemanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API