Legal Opinion
Boys v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 8, 2011No. 3:10-cv-00533PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Bruce Boys, brought this action against the defendant, Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”), as a judgment creditor of Morris I. Olmer to collect from Olmer’s Professional Liability Insurance Policy issued by Continental (the “Policy”). The plaintiff claims that Continental is liable for the full amount of the judgment, pursuant to Conn. Gen.Stat. § 38a-321. The plaintiff also claims that Continental violated the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act (“CUIPA”) and the Connecticut Unfair…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Christopher Graham v. Long Island Rail RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Joyce Bickerstaff v. Vassar CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baltas v. ErfeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- New England Systems, Inc. v. Citizens Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022