Legal Opinion

In re Steinberg

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 19, 1944No. 313PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The referee’s finding that the bankrupt “knowingly” made a false oath binds us, for the referee saw and heard the bankrupt testify and we cannot, therefore, go behind his conclusions as to credibility. The only question is whether the oath was “fraudulently made.” We would be inclined to say no, if this were a case of first impression; as the bankrupt had no assets, the omission of the claims of his relatives could not have been designed to prefer them, and it is difficult to perceive any fraudulent purpose, either in those omissions or the failure to include the claim…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re SlocumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. In re ZofferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  3. In re MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moreo v. Rossi (In Re Moreo)District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  2. In Re Patrick J. Cadarette, Bankrupt. Efa Acceptance Corporation v. Patrick J. CadaretteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. FinnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. In the Matter of Raymond Topper, Bankrupt. Raymond TopperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. In the Matter of Ben Melnick, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API