Fisher v. Ingula Builders Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
John P. Cohalan, Jr., J.
Motion by defendant to cancel a notice of pendency of action is granted. Plaintiff is the owner of the subject property. Defendant is the holder of a purchase-money mortgage on the property. Plaintiff has instituted an action for a judgment rescinding a contract of sale and for a cancellation of the bond and second mortgage executed by plaintiff to defendant. It appears from the papers before the court that plaintiff is not entitled to file a notice of pendency of action herein. See Starkie v. Nib Constr. Corp. (235 App. Div. 699 [2d Dept.]): “ Order reversed on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McManus v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Ackerman v. TrueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Starkie v. Nib Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932