Legal Opinion

Brooks v. New York State Thruway Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 11, 1980No. Claim 59820; Claim 59821PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The experts for both sides testified that the hole in the highway was neither of the size nor the depth to deflect the tire of the claimants’ vehicle. Nor was there evidence that striking the hole would produce any bump or condition which would cause the driver to lose control of the vehicle. The evidence was insufficient to establish a casual relationship between the State’s alleged negligence in failing to repair the pothole and the accident in this case. Although there was some testimony that…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Cordts v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Lopez v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Ball v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Gruen v. GruenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API