Brooks v. New York State Thruway Authority
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The experts for both sides testified that the hole in the highway was neither of the size nor the depth to deflect the tire of the claimants’ vehicle. Nor was there evidence that striking the hole would produce any bump or condition which would cause the driver to lose control of the vehicle. The evidence was insufficient to establish a casual relationship between the State’s alleged negligence in failing to repair the pothole and the accident in this case. Although there was some testimony that…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Arnold v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Cordts v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Lopez v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Ball v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Gruen v. GruenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.