Legal Opinion

Craig Mistler v. Worthington Armstrong Venture

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2017No. 17-1186Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2Per curiam

Craig Mistier appeals the district court’s order granting Worthington Armstrong Venture’s summary judgment motion on his claims, brought pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 to 2654 (2012) (FMLA), the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 (2012), and the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t §§ 20-606 to 20-609 (West 2014) (MFEPA). We have reviewed the record and considered the parties’ arguments and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Edward Yashenko v. Harrah's Nc Casino Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. Peninsula Regional Medical Center v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. United States v. Damien RileyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  4. Adkins v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API