Legal Opinion

Fitzsimons v. Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendants the Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, and the Aetna Insurance Company (hereinafter the carriers) are obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs in connection with three underlying actions to recover damages for personal injuries and injury to property, the carriers appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated June 7, 1994, as, upon granting the branches of the plaintiffs’ motion which were for summary judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. Government Employees' InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Roebuck v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API