Fitzsimons v. Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendants the Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, and the Aetna Insurance Company (hereinafter the carriers) are obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs in connection with three underlying actions to recover damages for personal injuries and injury to property, the carriers appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated June 7, 1994, as, upon granting the branches of the plaintiffs’ motion which were for summary judgment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lloyd v. Government Employees' InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Roebuck v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allstate Insurance v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001