Rummel v. Dealy
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Sioux District Court. — Hon. E. R. Gatnor, Judge. Action to compel a recanvass of votes in certain townships of Sioux county, Iowa. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Granger, O. J.
1 The facts of this case appear by stipulation, and it appears that Buncombe and Capel townships are voting precincts in Sioux county, Iowa; that the defendants were members of the board of supervisors of said county in 1898; that at the general election in 1898 the judges of election in said townships failed and neglected to properly certify and authenticate the election returns from said townships, and that in consequence thereof’ the board of supervisors in November, 1898, when canvassing the election returns in said county, refused to canvass the returns from said townships;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Benjamin v. District Township of MalakaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- State v. CaversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- State ex rel. Van Houten v. County JudgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- Matter v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Price v. HarnedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moren v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913