Legal Opinion
Brooks v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 19, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Action by Sarah Brooks against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.
1Opinion of the Court
. PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained, and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide event. Held, that the question of defendant’s negligence was one of fact for the jury.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Binswanger v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Binswanger v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905