Frozen Food Express v. United States
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CONNALLY, District Judge.
The history of this litigation and the issues which it raises are fully reflected in the opinion of this Court on original submission, 128 F.Supp. 374, to which reference is here made. Our dismissal of the action on that occasion, on the ground that the challenged order of the Interstate Commerce Commission was one not subject to judicial review, was reversed by the Supreme Court, 351 U.S. 40, 76 S.Ct. 569, and the action remanded for consideration on the merits. This requires a review of the action of the Interstate Commerce Commission in classifying the many…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Frozen Food Express v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Dictograph Products Co. v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Frozen Food ExpressSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Agricultural Transportation Association of Texas v. Wilbur C. KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- State ex rel. Department of Criminal Justice v. Vitapro Foods, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Lester C. Newton Trucking Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1967
- Milk Transport, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
- Mary Wilkins, Carrie Peterson, Carroll T. Webb, Rufus Webb and George Webb v. Inland Mutual Insurance Company, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.