Legal Opinion

State v. Lambert

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1932No. File No. 7396PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.

Defendant, a young man about 25 years of age, was charged with rape in the first degree (subdivision 3, § 4092, R. C. 1919; section 4095, R. C. 1919); the information alleging that he accomplished an act of sexual intercourse with a female several months beyond the age of 18 years, forcibly overcoming her resistance thereto. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, whereupon defendant moved for a new trial, which was granted by the court below. The order granting a new trial specified the grounds thereof as follows:

“1. The evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict and said verdict is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DachtlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State v. RuhaakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. GriffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. DuprisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. GriffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. HansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API