Legal Opinion
Matter of Tax Foreclosure No. 35. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1988PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Appellant property owner in this in rem tax foreclosure action by the City seeks to set aside a default judgment and redeem his former property, contending that the Administrative Code of the City of New York §§ D17-16.0, D17-17.0 (now §§ 11-416, 11-417) denied him due process by the failure to provide for actual notice to all property owners prior to tax foreclosure (see, Matter of McCann v Scaduto, 71 NY2d 164). Petitioner’s challenge must be rejected, however, and the Appellate Division order…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCann v. ScadutoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Selzer v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by20 opinions
- Small Engine Shop, Inc. v. Concetta Cangelosi Cascio, Don HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Township of Jefferson v. Block 447A, Lot 10New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Nitchie Barrett Realty Corp. v. BidermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Oznor Corp. v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Solomon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.