Legal Opinion

Hukle v. Kimble

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1950No. 37,910PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained when plaintiff was caught between a truck driven by one of the defendants and a pillar in the driveway of an elevator where plaintiff was working. The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence. He has appealed.

The petition alleged first the residence of the parties; that Minson and Kimble were holders of a common-carrier permit and as a prerequisite to the issuance of this permit the state corporation commission required a liability…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Sponable v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Smith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Gilmore v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Bergman v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cain v. SteelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Kendrick v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Gardner v. PereboomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Fry v. CadleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  5. Tuggle v. CathersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API