Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Kent

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the County Court of Nevada County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.

This action was commenced in a Justice’s Court to recover the amount due on a promissory note for one hundred and ninety-three dollars and thirteen cents, with cost of protest and interest. It was appealed to the County Court, where the plaintiffs recovered judgment for two hundred and four dollars, and the defendant appeals therefrom to this Court.

The appellant contends that the County Court had no jurisdiction to render judgment for a sum exceeding two hundred dollars, and that the judgment in this case is therefore void, and refers to the case of Fillett v. Engler (8 Cal. 76). In that case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zander v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Feillett v. EnglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Falon v. KeeseNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Driscoll v. DunwoodyMontana Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API