Hebert v. Crawford
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the rights of the trustee in bankruptcy and others in a crop of rice grown by the bankrupt and the jurisdiction of the state and Federal courts of the controversies arising thereover, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lamar
This conflict of jurisdiction, between state court and Bankruptcy Court, with injunction and counter-injunction, grew out of a controversy as to who was in possession of a crop of rice, when Moore & Bridgeman, who had planted it, filed their petition on July 16, 1906, to be adjudged bankrupts. If the rice was then in their possession the Bankruptcy Court had j urisdiction to administer it as assets of the estate,' and to determine all claims to the property. Babbitt v. Dutcher, 216 U. S. 102. Bryan v. Bernheimer, 181 U. S. 188. Bardes v. Hawarden Bank, 178 U. S. 524.
The firm of Beaumont Mills…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Murphy v. John Hofman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Bryan v. BernheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Babbitt v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- May v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Security Mortgage Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.