Legal Opinion
Broderick v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 16, 2003No. 02-72888; Tax Ct. No. 10847-00PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Glenn Broderick appeals pro se the judgment of the Tax Court, following a bench trial, dismissing his action contesting tax deficiencies for the years 1995, 1996, and 1997. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482. We review a Tax Court’s dismissal for failure to prosecute for abuse of discretion, Roat v. Commissioner, 847 F.2d 1379, 1383 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm.
The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Broderick’s action for failure to prosecute because he did not comply with Tax Court Rules 123(b) and 149(b), which require parties to stipulate to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norman E. McCoy and Mary Louise McCoy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Cathy Miller Hardy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Warner M. Larsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Roat v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Eric F. Weiss Mary E. Weiss v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Broderick v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008