Legal Opinion

United States v. Blacks

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 27, 1993No. ACMR 9201383Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of three specifications of failure to repair, two specifications of absence without authority, violation .of a lawful general regulation, wrongful appropriation, and assault, in violation of Articles 86, 92, 121, and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 892, 921, 928 (1982). Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of conspiracy to commit housebreaking and larceny, two specifications of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API