Legal Opinion

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court committed reversible error by denying defense counsel’s timely requests for a jury instruction on the issue of identification and in failing to furnish any identification instruction whatsoever. Where identification is an issue, as it was in this trial, a jury instruction must be given stating that the prosecution must prove the identity of the perpetrator beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Whalen, 59 NY2d 273, 278-279; People v Hambrick, 122 AD2d 163, 164, lv denied 69 NY2d 712; People v Beasley, 114 AD2d 415, 416, lv denied 66 NY2d 917).

The defendant testified and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. BeasleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. HambrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HattanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. SealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API