Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Moseley

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s decision to set aside a worker’s compensation compromise settlement agreement (“CSA”). By twelve points of error the worker’s compensation carrier, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence supporting the trial court’s findings of fact. By two additional points, Aetna contends the trial court erred in falling to find that appellee, James B. Moseley, should return benefits received under the CSA We affirm.

Moseley was employed by Hall Real Estate Company to perform maintenance…