Legal Opinion

Davis v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided November 2, 1993No. 06-92-00031-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

Faith Davis sued Twin City Fire Insurance Company because it refused to buy her a hot tub pursuant to a workers’ compensation settlement agreement. The trial court entered judgment unfavorable in part to each party and both parties appeal.

ISSUES

Davis contends that the trial court erred (1) in disregarding a jury finding awarding her $100,000 in exemplary damages, (2) in refusing to include prejudgment interest in the judgment, and (3) in concluding that the settlement agreement was ambiguous. Davis also contends that if this court deems a retrial of this case necessary,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Armstrong v. Randle, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
  3. Seneca Resources Corp. v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Amerjin Co., LLC, Amerijin Energy, LLC and Xi "Peter" Zhu v. Ashby LLP, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020
  5. Armstrong v. Randle, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API