Legal Opinion

Tackett v. Bolling

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 20, 1939No. Record No. 2028PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.

The question for our decision is the sufficiency of the allegations of a bill of review, brought to set aside a decree confirming the sale of certain real estate of the plaintiff in error, entered in a proceeding to subject her lands and the lands of another to the payment of a judgment lien against the lands of both.

*328Ida Mae Tackett, sometimes known as Ida Newsom or Ida Mae Newsom, will be hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, and Jessee 0. Bolling as the defendant.

Dr. R. L. Phipps obtained a judgment on November 1, 1982, against Patton Newsom and Ida Newsom, for the sum of $155, with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  2. Shickel v. Berryville Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1901
  3. Rush v. Dickenson County BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. Gemmell v. PowersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peatross v. GraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  2. Gutterman Iron & Metal Corp. v. Figg Bridge Developers, L.L.C.Chesapeake County Circuit Court · 2011
  3. Capitol Building Supply, Inc. v. Myung Il ChangFairfax County Circuit Court · 2012
  4. Refund Recov. Spec., LLC v. City of Norfolk, Va., a Mun. Corp. by & through its Treas., Duan HesterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API