Foster v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Action by William Foster against the City of New York.
1Per curiam
Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, on the ground that the notice of intention to commence the action was defective as to the statement of the time when the injuries were received, and that the form of denial contained in the answer did not exempt the plaintiff from the statutory obligation of proving the service of a proper notice. Purdy v. City of New York, 193 N. Y. 521, 523, 86 N. E. 560; Carson v. Village of Dresden, 202 N. Y. 414, 95 N. E. 803; Forsyth v. City of Oswego, 191 N. Y. 441, 84 N. E. 392, 123 Am. St. Rep. 605; Bannon v. City of New York, 150 App.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Forsyth v. . City of OswegoNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Purdy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Mack Paving Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Walker v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Bannon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.