Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. McKenna

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1915No. 19,422; No. 19,423PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Anderson district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The only question presented by this appeal is whether or not the amended petition (both cases being treated as one) states a cause of action, the plain*208tiff having appealed from an order sustaining a demurrer thereto.

In substance the pleading alleges that in Colony there was a mutual telephone company operating as a joint-stock concern for the purpose of rendering service to any one in the vicinity who would purchase stock therein. The plaintiff was a stockholder, but upon removing temporarily from Colony he transferred his stock to another…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Julian v. Kansas City Star Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Atkinson v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Holly v. City of NeodeshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Martin v. PicayuneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  5. Maddux v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. M. Rosenberg & Sons, Inc. v. CraftSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  2. Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local Union No. 795 v. Kansans for the Right to WorkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. Fritz v. Western Light & Power Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Key v. Kingwood Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Turman v. Solvay Process Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API