State v. Villa
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKennedy, Judge
{47} There is a profound difference between reviewing a verdict and producing a verdict. I join the majority in reversing Defendant’s conviction for insufficient evidence; it was impossible for him to commit crimes in violation of a discharge permit when no such permit legally existed. We correctly decided that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain those convictions. A directed verdict on the charges would therefore have been proper.
{48} JL-rdspectfully dissent from the majority’s 'accepting the invitation in the State’s supplemental brief to now, in the face of our…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Santillanes v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.