Southern Ry. Co. v. Chestnutt
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
This is a suit to recover damages under the federal Employers’ Liability Act (U. S. Comp. St. §§ 8657-8605).
The complaint, after stating the facts required to bring the ease within this form of action, avers, in substance, that the “pin” which held a curtain on the cab of an engine, was, by reason of negligence, etc., “insufficient or defective,” and as a proximate consequence thereof the plaintiff, while pulling down the curtain, was caused to fall and receive the alleged injuries. The pleas were in short by consent.
The main question here presented is the refusal of the general affirmative…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BerkshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Brown v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Coosa Pipe Foundry Co. v. PoindexterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Dwight Mfg. Co. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Davis v. SorrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Barger v. OswaltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Chance v. DALLAS COUNTY, ALA.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Chance v. DALLAS COUNTY, ALA.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984