Dingwall v. Chapman
New York Supreme Court
Demubbeb to the complaint on. the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
The essential allegations of the complaint are that the plaintiff was a customer of the defendants, a firm of bankers and brokers, and that, at his request, the defendants purchased 400 shares of the capital stock of the *194Southern Railway Company, which the plaintiff paid for; that the purchases were made at certain prices named; that thereafter the plaintiff demanded delivery of the stock, which was refused. The complaint also alleges that the said stock fluctuates and is of increasing value, and that, if defendants do not deliver the same, the plaintiff will suffer great, irremediable loss…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Black v. VanderbiltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Cody v. First National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Fox v. . FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Gilbert v. BunnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kosovits v. New York First Hungarian St. Stephen's Roman Catholic & Benevolent Society of Men & WomenNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- Perrin v. WhippleNew York Supreme Court · 1909