Legal Opinion

Keller v. Amedeo

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 9, 1987No. 87-C-0444PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENNIS, Justice.

We granted certiorari to consider whether, in an underinsured motorist case, the existence of additional liability insurance covering the alleged underinsured motorist is an affirmative defense which the UM carrier is required to set forth in its answer. The trial court allowed the plaintiff to recover from her UM carrier an amount in damages exceeding the policy limits of coverage on the offending vehicle. Evidence of an additional liability insurance policy applicable to the underinsured motorist was excluded on the ground that the existence of the additional policy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Webster v. RushingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Hickerson v. Protective Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. Campbell v. American Home Assurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  4. MacAluso v. WatsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Jordan v. Great American Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Alexander v. CornettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Nippert v. Baton Rouge Railcar Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Bonnett v. MizeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Martco Partnership v. FrazierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API