Legal Opinion
General Motors Corp. v. Romine
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 18, 1982No. 80-1273, 80-1295PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The defendant’s failure to timely and properly object: to the introduction of plaintiffs’ expert; to the use of a special interrogatory verdict form; and to the inconsistent verdict returned by the jury precludes appellate review of these matters. Consequently, we affirm.
Affirmed.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Muss v. BlakeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982