Marshall v. Eyemasters of Texas, Ltd.

*448 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ED KINKEADE, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Conditional Certification (Doe. No 82) and Defendants’ Objections to and Motion to Strike Portions of Declarations (Doe. No. 39). The Court has considered the motions, responses, replies, evidence submitted by the parties, and the applicable law. Because this Court determines that individual circumstances predominate such that the potential class members Plaintiffs seek to notify are not “similarly situated” as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), Plaintiffs’…