Legal Opinion
Strout Realty, Inc. v. Mechta
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 14, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for payment of a brokerage commission, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered April 5, 1989, as denied his motion to require the plaintiff to give security for costs, to dismiss the complaint for failure to file a note of issue and to forbid the plaintiff’s attorneys from taking any action herein for lack of a law license and granted that branch of the plaintiff’s cross motion which was to direct him to appear for a further examination before trial, and (2) an order of the same…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sainz v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Mechta v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rose v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Strout Realty, Inc. v. MechtaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Rose v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Strout Realty, Inc. v. MechtaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Strout Realty, Inc. v. MechtaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.