Legal Opinion

Metzger v. Cruikshank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1947No. Appeals, 75 and 76PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Fine, J.,

William F. Metzger, appellant, filed his bill in equity against Clarence H. Cruikshank, Burleigh Cruikshank* Barbara B. Cruikshank, and the George Washington Memorial Park, Inc., a corporation, to restrain the transfer, assignment or encumbrance of shares of preferred stock of the corporation, and to compel Clarence, Burleigh and Barbara B. Cruikshank to return to appellant, by proper transfer, 16.6% of shares previously given to Clarence and Burleigh Cruikshank pursuant to a written agreement. Preliminary objections were filed and, after hearing thereon, the court below…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Condel v. SavoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Beaver v. SlaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Northern Central Railway Co. v. WalworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Sherman v. HerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Duc v. Struckus Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huber v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. In re Consolidated Return of the Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Ricci v. Saia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API