Johnson v. Stanley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action for wrongfully and illegally appointing an overseer over the plaintiff, without any just or legal cause, on purpose to injure him, etc. Plea, severally not guilty. Issue to the court.
Read the full summary
Action for wrongfully and illegally appointing an overseer over the plaintiff, without any just or legal cause, on purpose to injure him, etc. Plea, severally not guilty. Issue to the court. Upon the evidence it appeared — That the plaintiff was capable of managing his affairs, and was industrious; that he had got into an unhappy dispute with some of the defendants; from whence arose a number of law suits, in some of which he was plaintiff, in some he was defendant: That the selectmen were too much influenced by the parties who were against the plaintiff, to take this step; from which in…
1Opinion of the Court
Adams and Wolcott, JJ.,
were for excusing the selectmen, upon the ground that they acted in a judicial capacity; but the court could not see.reason sufficient to excuse them on that ground.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Chalker v. ChalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Strong v. BirchardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824