Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 15, 1791PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for wrongfully and illegally appointing an overseer over the plaintiff, without any just or legal cause, on purpose to injure him, etc. Plea, severally not guilty. Issue to the court.

Read the full summary

Action for wrongfully and illegally appointing an overseer over the plaintiff, without any just or legal cause, on purpose to injure him, etc. Plea, severally not guilty. Issue to the court. Upon the evidence it appeared — That the plaintiff was capable of managing his affairs, and was industrious; that he had got into an unhappy dispute with some of the defendants; from whence arose a number of law suits, in some of which he was plaintiff, in some he was defendant: That the selectmen were too much influenced by the parties who were against the plaintiff, to take this step; from which in…

1Opinion of the Court

Adams and Wolcott, JJ.,

were for excusing the selectmen, upon the ground that they acted in a judicial capacity; but the court could not see.reason sufficient to excuse them on that ground.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chalker v. ChalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
  2. Strong v. BirchardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API