LEE HARRELL, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJeffrey W. Bates, P.J.
Lee Harrell (Movant) appeals from an order denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evi-dentiary hearing. 1 Because the motion court’s decision to deny relief was not clearly erroneous, we affirm.
In July 2009, Movant was charged by information with two offenses. Count I alleged that Movant had committed the class B felony of burglary in the first degree by knowingly and unlawfully entering a building, for the purpose of stealing, while armed with a deadly weapon. See § 569.160 RSMo (2000). Count II alleged that Movant had committed the unclassified felony of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- State v. KinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Christopher Sanders v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022