Legal Opinion

LEE HARRELL, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 2014No. SD32710PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffrey W. Bates, P.J.

Lee Harrell (Movant) appeals from an order denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evi-dentiary hearing. 1 Because the motion court’s decision to deny relief was not clearly erroneous, we affirm.

In July 2009, Movant was charged by information with two offenses. Count I alleged that Movant had committed the class B felony of burglary in the first degree by knowingly and unlawfully entering a building, for the purpose of stealing, while armed with a deadly weapon. See § 569.160 RSMo (2000). Count II alleged that Movant had committed the unclassified felony of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. State v. KinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Christopher Sanders v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API