Country Mutual Insurance v. Styck's Body Shop, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
JUSTICE STEIGMANN,
specially concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I concur in the majority’s conclusion as to the (1) jury instruction and (2) attorney fees and costs.
However, I respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority’s opinion in which it holds that, under the facts of this case, demand alone was sufficient to cut off the accrual of storage fees.
In my view, the pertinent question in this case is whether Body Shop’s damages for storage — which was the nature of the parties’ original agreement — should have been tolled when Country made demand for possession, even though Body…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pinkstaff v. Pennsylvania RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Brown and Kerr, Inc. v. American Stores Properties, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Arriola v. Time InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Kramer v. Mount Carmel Shelter Care Facility, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Board of Education v. McCoyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.