Legal Opinion

Ruppenthal v. Maag

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1941No. 35,040PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. It was submitted at the December session. An alternative writ was issued. *589The defendants filed an answer and plaintiff has filed a motion for a peremptory writ.

The following facts appear from the pleadings:

William Z. Graves, a resident of Russell county, Kansas, died intestate on February 6, 1925. His estate was administered and it was determined that Lucile Graves, a daughter, was entitled to $3,-384.98 as her distributive share; the administrator could not locate her, and after a year, or on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lindholm v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. State ex rel. Wells v. MarstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. State ex rel. McBride v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Kolster v. American Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. State Commission of Revenue & TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. In Re the Estate of NewlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. State ex rel. Anderson v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Dinsmoor v. CollinsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API