Boquet v. Tetra Technologies, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLfogg, J.
In this worker’s compensation case, the issue raised on appeal is whether or not the payment of supplemental earning benefits operates to interrupt prescription for a claim for medical expenses. Finding that it does, we reverse the judgment of the workers’ compensation judge.
On April 2, 1990, Ronald Boquet was injured while working for Tetra Technologies, ' Inc. After receiving 520 weeks of supplemental earnings benefits, Boquet’s benefits were terminated. The last medical expense payment made by the employ*942er’s insurer, Travelers Property and Casualty Corporation, was made on February 18,1994.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Younger v. Marshall Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Rapp v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Manuel v. River Parish Disposal, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Levatino v. Domengeaux and Wright, PLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Ancelet v. Moreno's Air Conditioning, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boquet v. Tetra Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Robertson v. Jefferson Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003