Legal Opinion

In re Bartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 17, 2005Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1994. He is also admitted to practice in Florida. Respondent presently maintains a law office in the Town of Niskayuna, Schenectady County.

Respondent was publicly reprimanded by the Supreme Court of Florida by order dated March 13, 2003. He was found guilty of neglecting client matters, assisting in the unlicensed practice of law, failing to respond to clients’ communications and failing to respond to inquiries of the Florida bar.

Petitioner moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline (see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent does not oppose…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re McKennaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API