Legal Opinion

Allen L. Lamar, Cross-Appellant v. L.A. Steele, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1983No. 81-2045PublishedCited by 26 opinions

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

1Per curiam

The application for rehearing complains that our opinion would allow a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cause of action to be based on “mere words” or “idle threats.” This reflects a misperception of our holding. Threats alone are not enough. A section 1983 claim only accrues when the threats or threatening conduct result in a constitutional deprivation.

Subject to this explanation, and treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor judge in regular active service of this court having…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Douglas Emmons v. Robert McLaughlin Donald Ratliff, Gary Dewalt, City of Norwalk, Reese WinemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Danielle J. Pittsley v. Sergeant Philip WarishCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Macko v. ByronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. White v. FauverDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  5. Macko v. ByronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API