Legal Opinion

Fox v. Robison

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1921No. 3184PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original application by Fox to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus against the Commissioner of the General Land Office. The application named as respondents, in addition to the Commissioner, T. M. Maes, and the Sun Company, as adverse claimants of permit to prospect for minerals on public land. The Sun Co. disclaimed interest.

Read the full summary

Original application by Fox to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus against the Commissioner of the General Land Office. The application named as respondents, in addition to the Commissioner, T. M. Maes, and the Sun Company, as adverse claimants of permit to prospect for minerals on public land. The Sun Co. disclaimed interest. John L. Wortham, C. C. Crocker, H. C. Davis, and J. J. Strickland, by leave, filed pleas of intervention, claiming right to permits by applications filed after the Land Commissioner had declared the permit issued to Maes cancelled.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

The relator instituted this proceeding in this Court to compel respondent J. T. Robison, Commissioner of the General Land Office, by mandamus, to accept his application and to issue to him an oil and gas permit, in terms of and conditioned as required by the law, based upon his application of date November 9, 1916.

Relator’s statement of the case is admitted by respondents to be correct, and same is as follows:

“April 11,1916, respondent Maes filed with the Clerk of the County Court an application for the right to prospect for oil and gas on 144^4 acres known as the Jonas Alltmont tract, in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Lipscomb County National Farm Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Metropolitan Insurance & Annuity Co. v. Peachtree Settlement Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company v. Structured Asset Funding, LLC D/B/A 123 LumpSum, Andrew Jonathan Settlement Fund, LLC, and Bradley Turpin.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Bynum v. ColquittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. in Re Esperanza Hughes, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API