Legal Opinion

Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 23, 2013No. Nos. 04 Md. 1603(SHS), 11 Civ. 8153(SHS), 13 Civ. 683(SHS), 11 Civ. 2400(SHS), 11 Civ. 2038(SHS), 12 Civ. 5615(SHS), 11 Civ. 4694(SHS), 12 Civ. 897(SHS), 12 Civ. 5082(SHS), 12 Civ. 7582(SHS), 11 Civ. 2037(SHS), 12 Civ. 5083(SHS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Claim Construction Opinion & Order

SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge.

Table of Contents

I. General Legal Standard...................................................425

II. The Abuse-Proof Patents.................................................425

*424A. Background.........................................................425

B. Construction of the Disputed Claims in the '963 Patent...................426

1. The final formulation cannot be a film or comprised of layered films.....427

2. The final formulation must contain at least 50% PEO by weight.....428

C. Construction of the Disputed Claims in the '314…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  5. Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API