Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
Claim Construction Opinion & Order
SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge.
Table of Contents
I. General Legal Standard...................................................425
II. The Abuse-Proof Patents.................................................425
*424A. Background.........................................................425
B. Construction of the Disputed Claims in the '963 Patent...................426
1. The final formulation cannot be a film or comprised of layered films.....427
2. The final formulation must contain at least 50% PEO by weight.....428
C. Construction of the Disputed Claims in the '314…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014