Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Bickel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The statutes of Wisconsin fix upon any one becoming a stockholder in a state bank a liability for *281the benefit of creditors “to the amount of their stock at par value thereof, in addition to the amount invested in said stock.”' Sec. 221.42, Stats. It'is also provided that when the Banking Commission takes over the affairs of a bank because its capital is impaired, because it is unsafe, because for it to continue business would be inexpedient, or for any of the other sufficient reasons set forth in the statute, this liability of the stockholder immediately accrues and becomes due and payable.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schwenker v. BekkedalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Pallange v. Liberty State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Corstvet v. Bank of DeerfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Kingston v. CreedonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API