Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 1978No. Agency No. 08-77-097, CA 9159Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This is a prison disciplinary case in which petitioner was found guilty of being in an unauthorized area and of making a false statement. Both charges arose out of the same incident. Petitioner claims that there was insufficient evidence to find him guilty of being in an unauthorized area and that his actions did not constitute making a false statement within the rule.

On August 15, 1977, at approximately 6:50 a.m., petitioner presented a pass to a corrections officer in order that he be permitted to enter the hospital area to see a doctor. Petitioner had an appointment with a doctor and was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hindman v. Oregon State Penitentiary, Corrections DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API